The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 is an Indian act, which aims to eliminate atrocities that are occurring against members of the SCs and STs while at the same time providing protection, compensation and rehabilitation to victims.
However, its implementation remains very weak and the conviction rates are shockingly low. A national-level process has therefore started in India to propose amendments and improve its enforcement under the name of The National Coalition for the Strengthening of the PoA Act.
What is the SC & ST Act?
Article 17 of the Constitution of India abolishes the age-old phenomenon of “untouchability”. The Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 & Rules, 1995 were specifically enacted to prevent and protect SC/STs from atrocities committed against them by non-SCs/STs, because the normal provisions of the existing laws like the Protection of Civil Rights Act 1955 and the Indian Penal Code were found inadequate to prevent and eliminate these offences.
The provisions of SC/ST PoA Act & Rules can be divided into three different categories. The first category establishes criminal liability for a number of specifically defined atrocities, and extends the scope of certain categories of penalizations given in the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The second category contains provisions for relief and compensation for victims of atrocities. The third category contains provisions that establish special authorities for the implementation and monitoring of the Act.
The common denominator of criminal offences is that criminal liability can only be established if the offence is committed by a person other than a member of SC/ST against a person who belongs to the SC/ST group.
Non-implementation of SC/ST Act
Despite the comprehensive provisions in the legislation, the implementation of the Act remains weak and inadequate. This was recognized by the Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in a speech delivered on 7 September 2009, when he said that “it is shocking that the conviction rate for cases of atrocities against SC/STs is less than 30% against the average of 42% for all cognizable offences under the IPC” (see more references below).
The National Human Rights Commission and the SC/ST Commission in India have made similar observations about the non-implementation and strong recommendations on the enforcement of the SC/ST Act, such as the Report on Prevention of Atrocities against Scheduled Castes authored by Shri K B Saxena which was submitted to the Prime Minister and State Chief Ministers in 2004. However, this has had little impact, if any, on the functioning of the state apparatus and the rule of law in India.
The actual numbers on non-conviction rates are far more worrying. As per the National Human Rights Commission Report on Atrocities against Scheduled Castes (2002), the progress of investigation of cases by the police analyzed from the governmental data indicated the following:
- The number of charge-sheeted cases was 53.04%
- 22.54% of cases were closed after investigation
- 24.42% of cases were pending at the police at the end of the year
- 30,350 cases registered during 2000 and as many as 8336 cases were closed after investigation without any trial
- 9,027 cases were still pending investigation
- Of 143,505 cases in Courts in the year 2000, 132,268 cases were pending, 9996 were acquitted and 1241 ended in conviction
Recommendations by the National Coalition for Strengthening SCs & STs (POA) Act (NCSPA):
In 2012 the following suggestions for amendments were made by the National Coalition for Strengthening SCs &STs (POA) Act (NCSPA):
- Amend and Enforce SCs & STs Act and Rules
- Atrocities Against Dalits and Adivasis – Proposed Amendments for Effective Monitoring and Implementation
Statements by Indian Prime Minister Mr. Manmohan Singh
- In an inauguration speech at the State Welfare Ministers’ Conference in New Delhi on 7 September 2009, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said: “It is shocking that the conviction rate for cases of atrocities against SC/STs is less than 30% against the average of 42% for all cognizable offences under the IPC. The State Governments therefore need to give more attention to this important issue. Meetings of State and district Vigilance and Monitoring Committees should be held more regularly. Court cases should be pursued diligently and on priority basis.” Link to speech
- At the 10th Inter-State Council Meeting in New Delhi on 9 December 2006, Mr. Singh remarked, “In the recent past, we have witnessed disturbing incidents and reports of atrocities against SCs and STs in some places. […] I believe that the time is ripe for a serious introspection and a comprehensive review of our existing approaches, existing strategies and existing measures which are in place so that we are effective in controlling such incidents and are able to generate a greater sense of security and hope among our weaker sections”. Link to speech
UN treaty bodies
Read the UN treaty body recommendations on the non-implementation of the SC/ST (PoA) Act, 1989 in India (CERD 2007, CESCR 2008, CEDAW 2007).
News article about the non-functioning of the SC/ST Act: “The judiciary is usually unwilling to accept the caste argument”, Tehelka, 15 October 2012
Amend and Enforce SCs & STs Act and Rules (2012)
Atrocities Against Dalits and Adivasis – Proposed Amendments for Effective Monitoring and Implementation (2012)
Link to the SC/ST (PoA) Act 1989
NCDHR report on the SC/ST (PoA) Act (2009)
NCDHR Position Paper for the Amendments of the SC/ST (PoA) Act
Report from the National Consultation on 20 YEARS OF SC & ST PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES ACT 1989
Atrocities report 2004 (An impressive document from the National Human Rights Commission)